Solutions
Are you prepared for an AI-enabled attack?
Attackers can now afford to examine every estate continuously. Revelion tests yours at the same cadence, under declared scope and documented authorisation, and reports only what it demonstrated.
What changed
Attention stopped being expensive
The shift is not that attackers got cleverer. It is that looking at an estate stopped costing anything worth budgeting for.
- Looking used to cost weeks
- A thorough examination of an estate took a skilled tester weeks and tens of thousands of pounds. That price is the entire reason testing happens annually.
- It now costs a day
- The same sweep runs in a day or two for tens of pounds. The constraint that made an annual cadence reasonable has gone, for us and for the people testing you without permission.
- The schedule did not move
- Most security programmes still test on the cadence the old price set. That gap is the exposure.
The exposure
The danger is drift, not genius
What an adversary who can afford to look at everything actually finds is rarely exotic. It is a year of ordinary change that nobody has examined.
- Estates change constantly
- New services, expired certificates, permissive access granted for a deadline and never revoked, test endpoints that outlived the test.
- None of it is exotic
- These are ordinary mistakes. They were survivable when nobody could afford to hunt for them across every estate.
- Eleven months of unexamined change
- An estate tested once a year carries, on average, most of a year of drift that nobody has looked at.
- Scanners see the list, not the path
- A queue of possible issues does not tell you which ones chain together into access in your environment.
What changes
Test at the attacker’s cadence
Revelion is not a replacement for a human red team. It covers the fifty-one weeks the scheduled engagement does not.
- Near-continuous coverage
- The estate is re-tested as it changes, so drift is caught rather than accumulated.
- Proven, not theoretical
- Findings arrive validated by exploitation, so triage is prioritisation rather than investigation.
- Scope control
- Declared targets, explicit exclusions, and code-level guardrails on anything intrusive.
- Documented authorisation
- Every mission runs against a recorded authorisation, which matters when testing recurs this often.
- Framework-mapped evidence
- Output lines up with SOC 2 and ISO 27001 control requirements.
- Reproducible for engineers
- Findings your own teams can confirm and close without a follow-up engagement.
Boundaries
What Revelion does not do
Revelion is not accredited. Where a scheme, an insurer or a contract requires a CREST or CHECK engagement, Revelion does not satisfy that requirement, and we would rather say so here than in a procurement call.
Revelion is not a replacement for a human red team. A skilled tester will still out-think an agent on novel, deeply contextual attacks, and on anything involving social engineering or physical access. That work is worth commissioning and worth keeping.
What a scheduled human engagement cannot do is run every week against an estate that changes every week. Keep the accredited test. Use Revelion for the other fifty-one weeks, so the scheduled engagement starts from a cleaner baseline and spends its time on the hard problems instead of rediscovering drift.
Related
Worth reading next
Find out what a year of drift looks like on your estate.
Talk to us