Solutions
The Autonomous AI Pentester for enterprise security teams
Recurring validation of your own estate, under declared scope and documented authorisation, producing evidence your auditors accept.
The gap
The estate changes faster than the testing schedule
An annual engagement describes the estate on the day it ran. Everything deployed afterwards is untested until the next one.
- Deployment outpaces assurance
- Teams ship weekly. Testing that happens yearly cannot describe what is running now.
- Scanners create backlog, not assurance
- A queue of unvalidated findings consumes analyst time without answering whether anything is exploitable.
- Point-in-time evidence ages badly
- By the time a report reaches the board, the estate it described has already moved on.
What changes
Validation that keeps pace with delivery
Revelion is not a replacement for a human red team. It covers the fifty-one weeks the scheduled engagement does not.
- Near-continuous coverage
- The estate is re-tested as it changes, so drift is caught rather than accumulated.
- Proven, not theoretical
- Findings arrive validated by exploitation, so triage is prioritisation rather than investigation.
- Scope control
- Declared targets, explicit exclusions, and approval gates on anything intrusive.
- Documented authorisation
- Every mission runs against a recorded authorisation, which matters when testing recurs this often.
- Framework-mapped evidence
- Output lines up with SOC 2 and ISO 27001 control requirements.
- Reproducible for engineers
- Findings your own teams can confirm and close without a follow-up engagement.
Where it sits
Recurring testing and the annual engagement, from one provider
A skilled human tester will still out-think an agent on novel, creative and deeply contextual attacks, particularly where social engineering or physical access is in scope. That work is worth commissioning and worth keeping.
What a human engagement cannot do is run every week against an estate that changes every week. That is the gap recurring validation fills, so the scheduled test starts from a cleaner baseline and spends its time on the hard problems rather than rediscovering configuration drift.
You do not have to source those two things separately. Revelion delivers the annual penetration test as a managed service alongside the recurring automated testing, with human oversight on both.
Managed service
The annual engagement, delivered by us, with human oversight
Recurring validation is the base layer. On top of it we run the scheduled, human-led engagement your auditors, insurers and clients expect, so both come from one provider against one estate record.
- Human-led annual penetration test
- A scheduled engagement conducted with human testers, scoped to your estate and delivered to the standard an audit expects.
- Human oversight on recurring testing too
- Findings from automated missions are reviewed rather than forwarded. Approval gates keep a person in the loop on anything intrusive.
- One estate, one history
- The annual engagement and every automated mission sit against the same estate record, so findings, remediation and retests carry forward instead of restarting each year.
- Fewer suppliers to assure
- One authorisation trail, one set of data-handling commitments, and one vendor for your own third-party risk process to assess.
Related
Worth reading next
Bring recurring testing and the annual engagement under one provider.
Talk to us