Compare
Revelion vs Horizon3.ai NodeZero
Horizon3.ai NodeZero is an autonomous pentesting platform with enterprise pricing estimated at $30K-100K per year. Revelion starts free with 10,000 credits and access on request from £10. See the full comparison.
At a glance
| Capability | Revelion | Horizon3.ai NodeZero |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free tier + from £10 | ~$30K-100K/yr (sales required) |
| Getting access | Request access, short review, no card | No: demo + sales process |
| Deployment | Docker agent (your machine) | Docker host |
| Real exploitation | Yes, with PoC | Yes, proof-of-exploitation |
| Internal testing | Yes (VPN tunnelling) | Yes |
| Identity attack paths | Limited | Yes (AD, Azure AD, cloud identity) |
| Continuous monitoring | Scheduled missions | Yes (NodeZero Tripwires) |
| Operating model | Autonomous, code-level guardrails; manual mode available | Limited |
| MSP features | Yes (25 clients, portal) | No |
| White-label reports | Yes (MSP plan) | No |
| Compliance frameworks | 9 frameworks built-in | MITRE ATT&CK mapping |
| PDF reports | Yes, CVSS + CVE | Yes |
| Target customers | SMBs, MSPs, consultants, enterprise | Mid-market, enterprise |
Where Horizon3.ai NodeZero Wins
Horizon3.ai has built a well-regarded autonomous pentesting platform with real traction in the mid-market and enterprise space. NodeZero is backed by significant venture funding and has a growing customer base. Here is where they genuinely outperform Revelion today.
Identity attack path coverage is NodeZero's strongest differentiator. Their platform excels at mapping and exploiting Active Directory misconfigurations, Azure AD weaknesses, and cloud identity risks. In environments where the biggest threat is credential-based lateral movement through a complex identity fabric spanning on-premises AD, Azure AD, and cloud IAM, NodeZero's identity testing depth is genuinely hard to match. They can trace attack paths from a compromised low-privilege account through group membership chains, delegation misconfigurations, and trust relationships to domain administrator compromise. For organisations where identity is the primary attack surface, this is a significant advantage.
NodeZero Tripwires is a clever feature that extends testing into continuous exposure monitoring. After a pentest identifies vulnerabilities, Tripwires deploys lightweight sensors that continuously watch for the same weaknesses to reappear. This turns a point-in-time assessment into ongoing validation. If someone re-introduces a misconfiguration that was previously fixed, Tripwires catches it. Revelion supports scheduled missions for repeated testing, but Tripwires offers a different and complementary approach to continuous security validation.
MITRE ATT&CK framework mapping is native to NodeZero's reporting. Every finding is mapped to specific ATT&CK techniques and tactics, which gives security operations teams a common language for understanding what was tested and what was found. This is particularly valuable for organisations that have already built their detection and response capabilities around the ATT&CK framework.
NodeZero also benefits from more mature enterprise integrations after several years in market. Their platform connects to a broader set of SIEM, SOAR, and ticketing tools out of the box. For enterprise security teams that need pentesting results to flow directly into their existing workflows, that integration maturity matters.
If you run a complex Active Directory environment, need continuous exposure monitoring through Tripwires, or require deep MITRE ATT&CK mapping for your SOC, NodeZero is a strong platform worth evaluating.
Where Revelion Wins
Price is the most immediate difference, and it is substantial. NodeZero's enterprise pricing is estimated at $30,000 to $100,000 per year depending on scope and deployment size. Revelion starts free with 10,000 credits and paid missions from £10 each. That is not a marginal difference. It is the difference between a platform accessible only to funded security programmes and one accessible to every security professional regardless of budget.
The route in changes the buying experience entirely. With Revelion, you request access, and once it is reviewed you deploy a Docker agent and run your first mission. NodeZero requires a sales conversation, a demo, and an enterprise agreement. Both platforms use Docker-based deployment, so the technical experience is similar. The difference is everything that happens before you get to that point.
Operating model is where Revelion fundamentally diverges from NodeZero's approach. Revelion runs the engagement autonomously, with guardrails enforced in the engine rather than left to an operator to catch. Where a team wants to watch it work, a supervised mode shows each planned action, the reasoning behind it and the expected impact before it runs. That is not a "pause" button. It is per-action visibility for the engagements where you want it, without making it the price of running one. You can also send live instructions to redirect the agent mid-mission toward specific hosts, services, or testing priorities. One toggle switches between manual approval and fully autonomous operation. NodeZero offers more limited operator control during active testing. This is why continuous, controlled testing matters more than annual assessments.
MSP and consultancy features are entirely absent from NodeZero. Revelion was built from the ground up to serve managed service providers and security consultancies alongside direct enterprise users. White-label reports carry your brand, not Revelion's. Your company name, logo, and colour scheme appear on every page of the report your client receives. The client management portal supports up to 25 separate clients with PIN-protected access, so each client can securely retrieve their own reports without seeing anyone else's data. NodeZero does not offer white-labelling or MSP client management because it was built for organisations testing their own environments.
Revelion maps findings to 9 built-in compliance frameworks: OWASP Top 10, PCI DSS, ISO 27001, NIST, SOC 2, GDPR, HIPAA, CIS Controls, and Cyber Essentials. NodeZero focuses on MITRE ATT&CK mapping, which is excellent for security operations but does not directly address compliance requirements. If your pentest report needs to demonstrate coverage against PCI DSS requirements or ISO 27001 controls for an auditor, Revelion generates that mapping automatically. You do not need to manually cross-reference findings against compliance frameworks after the fact.
Every Revelion finding includes real proof-of-concept exploitation with CVSS scoring and CVE references, just like NodeZero's proof-of-exploitation approach. The difference is not in exploitation quality. It is in everything surrounding it: the price, the access model, the operator control, and the service delivery features that let you use those findings in a professional engagement. Learn how autonomous AI pentesting works to see the full methodology.
Who Should Choose Which
Choose Horizon3.ai NodeZero if: Your primary concern is identity-based attack paths across Active Directory and Azure AD environments. You need NodeZero Tripwires for continuous exposure monitoring that persists between pentests. Your SOC is built around MITRE ATT&CK and you need findings mapped to that framework natively. You have a $30,000+ annual budget and prefer working through an enterprise sales process with dedicated support. You need mature integrations with your existing SIEM, SOAR, and ticketing systems. NodeZero's strength is identity-aware autonomous pentesting with continuous monitoring for mid-market and enterprise environments.
Choose Revelion if: You want real autonomous AI pentesting without enterprise pricing or a mandatory sales process. You are a security consultant, MSP, or SMB that needs to deliver pentesting results to clients with professional, white-label branded reports. You want human-in-the-loop control where you approve every action or go fully autonomous depending on the engagement. You need compliance mapping across 9 frameworks, not just ATT&CK. You need results today, not after a procurement cycle. Your budget is £10 per mission, not $30,000 per year. Revelion makes autonomous pentesting accessible to the entire market, from solo consultants to growing MSPs to enterprises that want a way in without the sales overhead.
Ready to See the Difference?
Start free with 10,000 credits. No sales call, no credit card, no enterprise agreement. Deploy a Docker agent on your machine, define your target scope, and watch an AI pentester work through reconnaissance, exploitation, and reporting in one session. Every finding includes real proof-of-concept, CVSS scores, CVE references, and automatic compliance mapping across 9 frameworks.
Related reading
Why Your Annual Pentest is Already Outdated
Annual pentesting creates 11-month blind spots. Infrastructure changes daily; your testing does not. Why continuous AI pentesting is the new baseline.
ReadWhat is Autonomous AI Pentesting?
A comprehensive guide to autonomous AI penetration testing: how intelligent agents perform reconnaissance, exploitation, and reporting without manual intervention, with real benchmark results.
ReadRevelion vs HackerOne
HackerOne is the largest bug bounty platform, connecting organisations with independent security researchers. Revelion is an autonomous AI pentesting platform starting from £10. See the full comparison.
ReadRevelion vs Cobalt
Cobalt is a Pentest-as-a-Service platform using vetted human pentesters, with engagements starting around $10K-25K. Revelion is an autonomous AI pentesting platform starting from £10. See the full comparison.
ReadFind out what an attacker would reach first.

